Har skjermkortet noe i det heletatt og si i motion? trodde det var ren prossesor avhengi jeg. men 9800 pro passer i en PowerMac G5 ja.TigerOla skrev:Har en G4 nå med Radeon 9800 pro. Denne vil vel fungere fint i en G5, right? De skjermkortene som til standard følger med en G5 er ikke noe å rope hurra for, i forhold til å jobbe med Motion. En Radeon 9800 vil vel gi en bra boost?
TrosTen skrev:Noen som kan revidere denne tråden med oppdatert info?
TrosTen skrev:Jeg går og lurer på om jeg skal oppgradere skjermkortet for å få en kjappere maskin. Har dual 1.8 med GeForce FX 5200 kort, og lurer på om jeg kan montere kort av samme type som sitter i de dyrere MACene.
rob-ART morgan skrev:If you must have dual-link, I recommend the ATI Radeon X800 XT as the best alternative, even though it's not offered direct from Apple. It's much faster than the Radeon 9650, supports the 30" Cinema on its DVI port, and takes up only one slot.
The GeForce 6800 Ultra is a full length, double wide monster. It was faster running some 3D games but slower running the Motion 2 and iMaginator. Unless you have two 30" Cinema displays and don't mind giving up one of your PCI-X slots, you should consider the Radeon X800 XT instead.
rob-ART morgan skrev:Did you know that the G5/2.7GHz Power Mac isn't always faster than a G5/2.5Ghz Power Mac or even a G5/2.0GHz Power Mac? That's because certain applications and certain functions within applications are more dependent on the speed of the graphics card than the speed of the CPU or the speed of the system bus.
I put the same graphics card (ATI Radeon X800 XT) in three different models of G5 Power Mac (2.7, 2.5, and 2.0GHz). The had the same memory configuration (4GB) and the same boot drive (MaXLine III with OS X 10.4.1). Then I ran three 3D Games and two "Pro" apps to see how they compared. The results may surprise you...
Returner til Diverse maskinvare og nettverk
Registrerte brukere: Google [Bot]